http://samharrelson.disqus.com/Sam Harrelson's BlogenFri, 21 Nov 2008 19:30:01 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2007/10/29/gmail-changes/#comment-2326814264<p>I noticed that loading attachments is much easier and faster now. Slow attaching was the main reason I avoided using gmail. You still can&amp;#39t highlight more than one file at a time, though. If I need to send a series of photos, I have to upload them one at a time. But it&amp;#39s much faster than before.</p>ErikFri, 21 Nov 2008 19:30:01 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2007/10/29/gmail-changes/#comment-409252417<p>I noticed that loading attachments is much easier and faster now. Slow attaching was the main reason I avoided using gmail. You still can&amp;#39t highlight more than one file at a time, though. If I need to send a series of photos, I have to upload them one at a time. But it&amp;#39s much faster than before.</p>ErikFri, 21 Nov 2008 19:30:01 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2007/10/29/gmail-changes/#comment-2326814265<p>I noticed that loading attachments is much easier and faster now. Slow attaching was the main reason I avoided using gmail. You still can't highlight more than one file at a time, though. If I need to send a series of photos, I have to upload them one at a time. But it's much faster than before.</p>ErikFri, 21 Nov 2008 14:30:00 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2007/10/29/gmail-changes/#comment-2326814263<p>I noticed that loading attachments is much easier and faster now. Slow attaching was the main reason I avoided using gmail. You still can't highlight more than one file at a time, though. If I need to send a series of photos, I have to upload them one at a time. But it's much faster than before.</p>ErikFri, 21 Nov 2008 14:30:00 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2007/10/29/gmail-changes/#comment-2326814266<p>I noticed that loading attachments is much easier and faster now. Slow attaching was the main reason I avoided using gmail. You still can&amp;#39t highlight more than one file at a time, though. If I need to send a series of photos, I have to upload them one at a time. But it&amp;#39s much faster than before.</p>ErikFri, 21 Nov 2008 11:30:01 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2007/10/29/gmail-changes/#comment-409252416<p>I noticed that loading attachments is much easier and faster now. Slow attaching was the main reason I avoided using gmail. You still can&amp;#39t highlight more than one file at a time, though. If I need to send a series of photos, I have to upload them one at a time. But it&amp;#39s much faster than before.</p>ErikFri, 21 Nov 2008 11:30:01 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2007/10/29/gmail-changes/#comment-3932487<p>I noticed that loading attachments is much easier and faster now. Slow attaching was the main reason I avoided using gmail. You still can't highlight more than one file at a time, though. If I need to send a series of photos, I have to upload them one at a time. But it's much faster than before.</p>ErikFri, 21 Nov 2008 09:30:01 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2007/10/29/gmail-changes/#comment-1711593<p>Anonymous-</p><p>Sure, there have been a few minor changes and tweaks but the good stuff (faster loading, better contact manager, IMAP integration, more memory) seems to be coming all at once.</p>Sam HarrelsonTue, 30 Oct 2007 10:47:34 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2007/10/29/gmail-changes/#comment-1711594<p>Uh for someone who sounds as attentive to detail as you do, I'm surprised you say it "stagnated." What about this:<br><a href="http://mail.google.com/mail/help/about_whatsnew.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://mail.google.com/mail/help/about_whatsnew.html">http://mail.google.com/mail...</a></p><p>They've been making changes and adding features for a long time now... and consistently! &gt;.&gt;</p>Ender WigginTue, 30 Oct 2007 00:18:09 -0000