-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Sam, really enjoyed just listening to your audio post. I'm in my "basement" trying to get a web site redesign done, and yet my mind has wandered to so many other things. Christian and Jewish ...
- Thanks so much, Tim!
- Good luck with your new ventures, friend.
- If that's the 10th or 11th, then sure thing. Hit me up on twitter or email.
- I'm working on my Imagine album now :) Want to do a show sometime next week? Maybe Wed or Thurs?
Sam Harrelson's Comment Forum
SamHarrelson's Blog
Everyone loves fame (except for the wise ones), so it’s no surprise that there’s been an over abundance of “popular” lists and rankings emerging from all areas of the blogosphere lately.
The sad fact is that no one really cares.<b ... Continue reading »
The sad fact is that no one really cares.<b ... Continue reading »
10 months ago
Word!
Glad to discover you blog. Subscribed!
10 months ago
In marketing statistics are important, though it is very hard currently to measure how influential or valuable a blog audience is.
10 months ago
Our campaigns, and the metrics we use to measure them or rate them, are based on performance. Quality is a component of those metrics, but even then quality is seen in the lens of performance.
On the other hand, measuring something like the quality of blogs or the blogosphere is different because there are many more variables besides just performance. Besides, what I think might be indicate good "performance" on a blog (comment quality, type of readership, passion about a subject, etc) might be markedly different than what someone thinks indicates performance on a blog such as ad money generated, feed subscriber numbers, page views, etc.
Thanks for dropping by, guys!