http://samharrelson.disqus.com/Sam Harrelson's BlogenTue, 28 Apr 2009 19:59:37 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2009/04/24/twitter-as-graffiti/#comment-1879317652<p>I think that&amp;#39s a helpful perspective. Though there&amp;#39s not much of a learning curve on Twitter, there&amp;#39s an adaptation curve. "What will this give me and how will I contribute?" is an evolutionary process. <br><br>And there&amp;#39s always the charitable response to fall back on. If someone I follow tweets "Can&amp;#39t decide whether to walk or bike today," well, Rainwater+Duck&amp;#39s back = move along. It cost me about 8 nanoseconds of my time unless I allow it to distract or irritate me.</p>RozDTue, 28 Apr 2009 19:59:37 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2009/04/24/twitter-as-graffiti/#comment-97524510<p>I think that's a helpful perspective. Though there's not much of a learning curve on Twitter, there's an adaptation curve. "What will this give me and how will I contribute?" is an evolutionary process. <br><br>And there's always the charitable response to fall back on. If someone I follow tweets "Can't decide whether to walk or bike today," well, Rainwater+Duck's back = move along. It cost me about 8 nanoseconds of my time unless I allow it to distract or irritate me.</p>RozDTue, 28 Apr 2009 15:59:37 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2009/04/24/twitter-as-graffiti/#comment-1879317653<p>I think that's a helpful perspective. Though there's not much of a learning curve on Twitter, there's an adaptation curve. "What will this give me and how will I contribute?" is an evolutionary process.</p><p>And there's always the charitable response to fall back on. If someone I follow tweets "Can't decide whether to walk or bike today," well, Rainwater+Duck's back = move along. It cost me about 8 nanoseconds of my time unless I allow it to distract or irritate me.</p>RozDTue, 28 Apr 2009 14:59:00 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2009/04/24/twitter-as-graffiti/#comment-1879317654<p>I think that's a helpful perspective. Though there's not much of a learning curve on Twitter, there's an adaptation curve. "What will this give me and how will I contribute?" is an evolutionary process.</p><p>And there's always the charitable response to fall back on. If someone I follow tweets "Can't decide whether to walk or bike today," well, Rainwater+Duck's back = move along. It cost me about 8 nanoseconds of my time unless I allow it to distract or irritate me.</p>RozDTue, 28 Apr 2009 14:59:00 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2009/04/24/twitter-as-graffiti/#comment-1879317656<p>I think that&amp;#39s a helpful perspective. Though there&amp;#39s not much of a learning curve on Twitter, there&amp;#39s an adaptation curve. "What will this give me and how will I contribute?" is an evolutionary process. <br><br>And there&amp;#39s always the charitable response to fall back on. If someone I follow tweets "Can&amp;#39t decide whether to walk or bike today," well, Rainwater+Duck&amp;#39s back = move along. It cost me about 8 nanoseconds of my time unless I allow it to distract or irritate me.</p>RozDTue, 28 Apr 2009 12:59:37 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2009/04/24/twitter-as-graffiti/#comment-8776205<p>I think that's a helpful perspective. Though there's not much of a learning curve on Twitter, there's an adaptation curve. "What will this give me and how will I contribute?" is an evolutionary process.</p><p>And there's always the charitable response to fall back on. If someone I follow tweets "Can't decide whether to walk or bike today," well, Rainwater+Duck's back = move along. It cost me about 8 nanoseconds of my time unless I allow it to distract or irritate me.</p>RozDTue, 28 Apr 2009 10:59:37 -0000http://samharrelson.com/2009/04/24/twitter-as-graffiti/#comment-97524511<p>I think that's a helpful perspective. Though there's not much of a learning curve on Twitter, there's an adaptation curve. "What will this give me and how will I contribute?" is an evolutionary process. <br><br>And there's always the charitable response to fall back on. If someone I follow tweets "Can't decide whether to walk or bike today," well, Rainwater+Duck's back = move along. It cost me about 8 nanoseconds of my time unless I allow it to distract or irritate me.</p>RozDTue, 28 Apr 2009 08:59:37 -0000